Your source of Free Articles Your source of Free Reprint Articles and Content! Login

Find an Article:, your source of Free Articles about: Management

Organization Structures in Different Countries

management, business, organization, administration, organizational structure, planning, leading, directing, controlling, staffing

There is considerable interest today in whether the structures of similar organizations in different cultures are similar—if, for example, a bank is a bank is a bank, regardless of the cultural values that spawned it. Alternatively, cultural norms and values may have considerable impact on organizational form. The evidence is and there is considerable disagreement over whether U.S. theories and findings have applicability abroad.

Studies across the world find that organizational forms are becoming increasingly similar. There are still national differences, however. Japanese organizations, for instance, seem to have a characteristic structure when one examines the abundance of qualitative data. What are typical characteristics of the Japanese organizational structure compared with those of American firms? It is clear that significant differences exist between the two types of structures in terms of division of labor, hierarchy, span of control, and decision making. However, there are also similarities; in both the United States and Japan "tallness" (many levels) is associated with lower employee commitment and satisfaction than "flatness" (few levels).

Other examples of national differences are apparent in the degree of centralization. European multinational firms favor local control, while American firms lean toward more centralized management. This contrast may reflect either differences in attitudes about obedience and authority, the histories of the countries, or other factors. With this orientation toward local control, European companies tend to use a national subsidiary structure rather than a system of international divisions, as favored by American companies. National subsidiaries report directly to the top without such intermediate or intervening levels as international or regional divisions. This structure helps grant autonomy to affiliates.
Published: 2007-04-17
Author: Martin Hahn

About the author or the publisher
Martin Hahn PhD has received his education and degrees in Europe in organizational/industrial sociology. He grew up in South-East Asia and moved to Europe to get his tertiary education and gain experience in the fields of scientific research, radio journalism, and management consulting.

After living in Europe for 12 years, he moved to South-East again and has worked for the last 12 years as a management consultant, university lecturer, corporate trainer, and international school administrator

Source: - Free Articles

Most popular articles from Management category
Buy this article  
Full Rights: 20.00

Article Categories
Arts and Entertainment Automotive Business   Advertising   Affiliate   Business (General)   Business Ethics   Business Etiquette   Careers   Communication   Customer Service   Economy   Entrepreneurial   Home Based   Jobs/Employment   Management   Marketing   MLM   Money Making Ideas   Networking   Online Business   Public Relations   Real Estate   Sales Communication Computer and Internet Finance Health and Fitness Home and Family Legal News and Society Pets and Animals Recreation and Sports Science Self Improvement Travel


Home | Submit an article | Benefits | Terms and Conditions | Top Writers | Contact-Us| Login

Copyright - Free Reprint Articles -